Re: Thank you for the clarification

Date: 2009-01-22 06:22 pm (UTC)
I agree with you about the lack of meat.

But I disagree about whether the characers grew in interesting ways. They may have done so over the course of AtF. But that's after having first shed much of what was interesting about them when they were handed over to Lynch. Angel was much more complex in AtS than in AtF. He and Spike were at a different stage from the one we first see in AtF. Wesley had much more interesting things going on when he died. etc. etc.

I think it's clear that Whedon had more of a hand in AtS than AtF. That's exactly the distinction I take him to be making in that interview. Also, I think he shared responsibility for AtS with guys who are quite talented in their own right. Minear, especially. I hear that interview as Whedon basically walking back any idea that AtF is canon -- and I'd like to think it's because he realizes that it just isn't good enough to be part of canon.

And if we see AtF as a non-canonical fiction about those characters, then I'm with you in being able to enjoy it all much more. Lynch is a perfectly good writer if you stop trying to see the work as a real continuation of AtS. At least that's where I am at the moment.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

maggie2: (Default)
maggie2

September 2010

S M T W T F S
    1 234
5 678 91011
12 131415 161718
19 2021 22 232425
26 272829 30  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags