ext_15449 ([identity profile] eilowyn.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] maggie2 2010-08-29 08:59 pm (UTC)

So are you stating that because some of what Giles says is suspect, all of what Giles says is suspect? It feels like you're picking and choosing to cancel out the parts of Giles' exposition that challenges your interpretation.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting