maggie2: (Default)
maggie2 ([personal profile] maggie2) wrote2010-09-22 03:34 pm

State of Confusion Prompts Stream of Conscience Rambling

The last few days have been depressing, haven't they?  I feel the need to ramble a bit.

I like the comics.  I think they have a shot at being really great.  Yet when I read Barb's post on the preview pages for #37, and especially the comments, I feel sad.  Not because people disagree with me.  Not because I feel like my own position is being slighted.  But because people I respect, admire and even care about seem wounded by the comics.  And I wonder if every time I write about them it's rubbing salt in wounds.  I don't know what to do with that.  I'm enjoying the note project.  But my ongoing engagement with the fandom is because I think the comics are interesting to think about, and they are what I most want to write about. 

Obviously people can just not read my stuff.  It's just the parting of the ways, that seems sad.  And the feeling that some people might carry on reading my posts even if it makes them unhappy. 

On the Spuffy.  I am first and foremost a Spike fan.  That puts me in a different spot.  In principle, Spike could get trashed the way Angel has been thoroughly trashed.  But I rather more suspect that Spike is playing a role in the comics similar to Faith.  Faith is there as a contrast case for Buffy. Spike is there as a contrast case for Angel.  That decenters Spike some -- or would if that's all we get.  But Spike's story is actually done.  He's died the big glorious death.  I could certainly enjoy and value a story going forward about him coming into his own.  I'd love to see him get a big loving happy ending with someone.  But I don't need that.  He's made his big life choice, and we've seen enough to know that it's real.  Whatever else we get is nice, but I don't need something.  Ergo, I can kick back and enjoy him flying in on his bug ship; sitting around on his bed in white socks; and being quintessentially Spike with his cork example (repeated for Xander's benefit!). 

I'm grateful that he's not coming in all weepy about the Bangel.  I don't mind him dissing Buffy for her lack of education.  She chose Captain Hammer over him and if he wants to get in his digs, I don't have a problem with it.  She's leveled a lot of low blows on him over the years.  And she's been very harsh when he needed a kick in the pants (Get it Done).  I've learned to appreciate what she was doing there.  He's doing the same for her here.  She does need a kick in the pants.

Buffy's character has been put into a very dark light.  I actively like this.  Buffy has always been a little bit self-righteous.  The next step in her story had to be the place where her moral certainty gets battered.  I doubt we leave it here; she'll build back up, and will be a richer character for the journey.   Is it OOC that Buffy has fallen in the manner we see her fall here?  I'll ponder that a bit more below.  But the fact of her fall isn't a problem for me.

I think it's very interesting to see Spike and Buffy together when he's the one with the moral high ground.  From the moment we had the BtBR panel, I've wondered how that would play.  A lot of people assume Spike would be all pro-Buffy no matter what.  I hoped he wouldn't.  I like the way he's handling it here.  He's calling her on what she needs to be called on, but in a way that firmly maintains the connection between them.  The reason I count this as a very positive development in Spuffy is because the ground has shifted in a way that is interesting, and because the aura of old marrieds is so overwhelming.   Even if it's only friendship, these two have come such a phenomenal distance together. 

Do I need more?  Do I need UST or sex or hearts and flowers?  I'd like it, to be sure.  But I think there's something right to the thought that any S/B love relationship really needs Buffy's Bangel issues to be knocked out first.  Were they not, Spike would be re-running his relationship with Dru -- having 'epic' love with a woman for whom he's the second choice.  Buffy needs to have Angel and have it not work before she could get to a real Spuffy relationship that would make me happy.  The comics have created space for that -- since Joss has taken a wrecking ball to Bangel.   I don't think we'll enter into that space -- or at least not any time soon.  But we're going to have real friendship, I think.  Maybe even with benefits.   (The scene is in the bedroom; Georges has said shirtless Spike; neutral readers are catching a whiff of something; Georges has told the Bangels to be very afraid specifically about the Spuffy; it's not impossible).

Perhaps for Spuffy fans who think that the Bangel issues were already history this doesn't work.  But I've always thought that Angel had a stranglehold on Buffy's heart -- and I like that the story is finally dealing with that.  I like that a lot.

One thing that made me very happy about the Spuffy pages we've seen so far is that some non-shipper fans who never much saw the appeal of Spuffy liked them here.  There's a rehabilitation of Spike (and possibly Spuffy) that I appreciate.  It's a relationship that is and was important, even if it ends up not being 'shippy.  And that's now very well established.  And like I said, posts from folks saying they never much liked them before, but like them now make me happy.  I like for Spike to be liked.

That leaves the big looming question.  Joss has turned Angel into Captain Hammer.  He's writing a story about how Twu Wuv 4eva Bangel literally destroys his narrative 'verse.   I love the subtext on those things becoming in your face text.  But.  It's doing so by telling a different sort of story.  The entire 'verse is knocked askew.  I read the Twilight event as literally taking the show and turning it into bad fanfic.  Elements of the story are lifted out, highlighted, and thereby distorted.  It's not just Angel or Bangel.  Xander is practically a Gary Stu.  Willow is a goddess.  Places like England and Germany are now bad cliches.   The entire structure of the 'verse is bent and twisted and distorted and is going to rip apart.  We've been told repeatedly that nothing will be the same in the wake of the finale of season 8.  I read Buffy's distortions in this context.   Angel was always her prince.  But that element of her story is now exaggerated and distorted.  It makes her look like she's regressed.  I think there's a truth to it that's important.  I stand by my "Spuffy reading" (which was really an anti-Bangel reading).  But it's truth told strange.  I want to see how it plays out.  But do understand that the reason it works for me is because it's in the context of this funhouse version of 'the verse.

The meta is inevitably going to be painful for fans.  Buffy's story had been told.   To want to revisit it for more of the same would be to invite a rehash and banality.  Fans may want that, a lot.  But it can't be a good story if it just keeps going because fans want to.  The seed of the story was planted and was fruitful, but it had an expiration date.  The only way the story can go on in a vital way is if the 'verse literally gets ripped apart and remade.  I look forward to seeing what that looks like.  But for everyone invested in the story as it was, Joss is very sharply saying let go.  It's not surprising that a lot of fans *are* letting go.  I'm not sure how I feel about that.  I admire what the story has to do.  I don't like the destruction left in its wake.   I'm especially ambivalent about the naked metaphors about the fandom, which I read as portraying us as at least somewhat malevolent.  I'd say Joss has some issues with us.

My last thought of the afternoon is about Buffy being punished again for sex.  No.  That's not what's happening here.  Her sex with Satsu wasn't punished.  It wasn't going to take cause she wasn't much with the gay and she wasn't open for relationship with her, but the sex was good and nothing bad happened as a consequence.  What we are doing is revisiting Buffy's primal wound around her first sexual experience.  This is all about Angel, not all about sex.  And nota bene: Spike's bed is in a corner just like Angel's bed was.  That's what this is all about. 

Thus my ramblings.  I very much look forward to the last few issues.  I am scared.  If all the 'verse is distorted and trashed, Spike may well catch it bad at some point.  My hope is that he and Faith are there for different reasons.  But who knows?  Meanwhile, I am very sad about the present turmoil in the fandom.  Big hugs all around.  I've got no comfort to offer, and I hate it when people are hurting.

[identity profile] norwie2010.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Buffy's story had been told. To want to revisit it for more of the same would be to invite a rehash and banality. Fans may want that, a lot. But it can't be a good story if it just keeps going because fans want to. The seed of the story was planted and was fruitful, but it had an expiration date. The only way the story can go on in a vital way is if the 'verse literally gets ripped apart and remade.

This means Buffy Summers has to die. (At the very least to be send away, imprisoned, etc.) The universe (story) may then freely splinter and tiny crystals tell different tales with Characters that are not Buffy (arcs in season 9&10).

This is the final consequence of it (ironically, spaceporn wouldn't be "Bangel's last hurrah" - but Buffy's last hurrah - we'll see if she gets a send-off by Spike, too).

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
There's definitely room for Buffy to die. But I tend to think that now that she's been torn down as she has, her story does need to keep going.

[identity profile] local-max.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
No, he's not. #33/34 gutted me like a fish and left me flailing in a tailspin for months until a month ago when I finally realized I wasn't hurt anymore.

Yeah. It was a pretty harsh pair of issues. :S


LOL! Now you have fanwanked the bad writing by Krueger. I can accept that. Just like how I can accept that SMG lost her voice from flying to Australia to shoot Scooby Doo while shooting Season 7, but that this works in the sense that Buffy is so tired in Empty Places/Touched that she has no voice left.


Ha! And the Buffy voice thing totally works. If the First sounded slightly nicer it'd be even better, but alas....

[identity profile] infinitewhale.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)

I can accept that. Just like how I can accept that SMG lost her voice from flying to Australia to shoot Scooby Doo while shooting Season 7

That movie was shot during S5.

[identity profile] hazel75.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Your posts never rub salt in the wound. I will say I think I'm going to take a break from comics meta, but I'll still be around for the other stuff :)

[identity profile] angearia.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think it's an actual reaction to fandom, though. I think Joss writes stories that are born from pain, his own pain. Self-indulgent. On a lot of days, I feel like writing is the epitome of self-indulgence and selflessness all at once. Because you are laying bare your soul, pouring out all your pain, all your issues, but at the same time, you're sharing and creating a story that is for the entertainment of others.

The one thing I remember a lot is that Joss says "trust the story, not the storyteller." I imagine he doesn't want us blaming him just as much as he doesn't want us lauding him.

In Australia, the person running the event asked him what it felt like to be a god and he said, "I don't believe in me."

If anything, I think Season 8 is about the power of stories, not the storyteller. And all the manipulations we see, the dog licking his balls--these are all Joss' judgments of himself. He is the evil universe pulling strings.

And hey, this might be because I relate to Joss by extension of how I relate to Buffy. But that theme of self-disgust I was talking to you about in TYSK--I think Joss has it too. Joss is Buffy, according to him, and look what he's doing to her.

[identity profile] angearia.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)
The sequel was shot during Season 7, though. SMG talked about it in interviews how she was so exhausted from flying back and forth and playing two roles, then Joss tells her she's going to play both Buffy and The First to spice things up even more.

[identity profile] angearia.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
This is a great post. I was happy to read it. Thanks. :)

I think it's interesting that you point out Buffy's self-righteousness. I think that's where she gets her "inferiority complex about her superiority complex". It reminds me that the protagonist privilege is a part of her identity, but something that she is ashamed of and has internalized.

[identity profile] local-max.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 12:01 am (UTC)(link)
YAY THANK YOU for writing this more clearly than I could.

Joss is so totally Buffy. That she's still obsessed with childish things and needs her world to fall apart to move forward is astonishing self-criticism. The question of whether Joss loves Buffy seems in some ways silly--he obviously loves her, have you seen the way he writes her?--but maybe he does wish she, and he, could move forward.

Anyway, he's also Dr. Horrible, who kills the woman (character?) he loves as part of his plans to be noticed, and then finds himself lonelier than ever when he becomes famous.

[identity profile] angearia.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 12:06 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly! Ooooh, well said about Dr. Horrible. I'd never thought of it that way before, but yeesh.

I've always gotten the feeling that with the more power Joss gets, the more uncomfortable he is with what it does to him. His stories always seem to come back to abuse of power and how power can lead to darkness.

And as Joss has become more powerful in his career, his stories about abuse of power have become more and more incisive.

[identity profile] local-max.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
I know!

And at the end of Chosen he finished his show. He was done. And now the story went on to whoever wanted to continue the story. But...could he really let go of being the one storyteller? And there were people out there abusing the story, as well as people making something beautiful out of it. Wasn't Chosen asking the viewer to be strong and take control? Why is he back in charge, when the story should be in the hands of every viewer?

"Thing about changing the world. Is when you do...the world's all different. Everybody calls me 'sir' these days.... Here at Command Central, not so much with the hilarious. More with 'What the hell am I doing?'"

[identity profile] angearia.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 12:18 am (UTC)(link)
It's so crazy seeing so much Joss in Season 8. Like, he's pouring his heart into this. There is so much pain and self-doubt and self-disgust.

It's why calling this crackfic feels... hurtful to him. I can't imagine my posting a story I poured my heart and soul into and someone coming along and tearing it apart.

I mean, I understand how and why people call Season 8 crackfic. It has crackiliciousness in it. But it is coming from a heartfelt place and I understand not liking the story, but when I read Season 8, I kinda just ache because of all the self-disgust in it, because of all the issues I can see an almost invisible thread tracing back to Joss.

We write who we are. We write from places of pain, our pain.

And I think about Joss calling himself a "sad, bitter old man" and there's this self-awareness there, that he sees himself this way and I think maybe wishes he wasn't.

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 12:22 am (UTC)(link)
Agree with both of you guys about how much Joss is in all of this. He's going through exactly what she went through. Aycheb keeps making much about Buffy's fame, the awe with which people treat her. But she's still so fallible. The fear of what happens when people wake up and notice is palpable.

Anyway, just wanted to chirp in and say, yeah!

[identity profile] angearia.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 12:25 am (UTC)(link)
It almost feels... inconsiderate? Inappropriate? that some of us are so aware of what Joss is saying about himself with his work.

But sometimes I can't help thinking about it. It's just another layer to the story that adds resonance for me.

[identity profile] infinitewhale.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 12:32 am (UTC)(link)

Buffy's character has been put into a very dark light. I actively like this. Buffy has always been a little bit self-righteous. The next step in her story had to be the place where her moral certainty gets battered. I doubt we leave it here; she'll build back up, and will be a richer character for the journey. Is it OOC that Buffy has fallen in the manner we see her fall here? I'll ponder that a bit more below. But the fact of her fall isn't a problem for me.

Buffy isn't retrievable at all given that these mistakes have nothing to do with being self-righteous, her personality or her character. Buffy has never thought she was always right about everything. That was a main character point in S6 and S7. This commentary in the comics seems more dedicated to activating the slayers--Buffy thought it was right, apparently no one else did. There is no bridge-gap between that and this any more than there was Willingham's Spike to Whedon's and Lynch's. None.* You can't come back from something when you don't know how you got there, how you go from not beating evil by doing evil to bankrobbing, blackmail and usery. All you end up with is a hypocrite, one that didn't feel about about those mistakes.

Buffy being punished again for sex.

Buffy gets punished for having sex with 'bad boys'. The issue with Joss in this is he catered to Bangels for years and now wants to smack them in the face, presumably. As a storyteller, he had every opportunity to send that message to a much broader public, never did. Instead he's going back on a more mature end to both relationships for a rather sexist diatribe on the subject. He's preaching, basically, not telling a story if that's the case.

*The fact that there isn't an explanation leads me to believe another shoe will drop. We're told why Willow cheats, why Dawn did, even why Angel did what he did and how they came to those decisions. Not so much for Buffy, which is odd. Hints at a wish in the first dream might suggest an accidental Faustian deal or someone did something to her. The bits about puzzle pieces as well. To me, her lying on the ground like that is a little over the top for just a betrayal.

I think Norwie is onto something that Buffy has to die. Not in the sense of actually dying, but I think there are lots of indicators she'll be cast away at the end. That is her nightmare. You have Willow's rather out of nowhere hinting that she wouldn't bring Buffy back again in ABH. We know magic is going away, probably when the Seed breaks and Spike suddenly pops up with a trans-dimensional ship and we know he'll be around a lot in S9.

My guess is the Seed is destroyed and the spell/wish/whatever on Buffy gets removed, she becomes aware and is left trapped in another dimension.

[identity profile] infinitewhale.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 12:36 am (UTC)(link)

The sequel didn't start filming until after shooting wrapped. They pushed back the date. She left right after wrapping up and that's why she wasn't at the cast party. The sequel was filmed in Vancouver.

[identity profile] angearia.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 12:42 am (UTC)(link)
I've literally watched video of SMG saying she was doing both Season 7 and Scooby Doo at the same time.

I... am really too tired to go looking for proof right now. Just, drama. But I swear to you, I've watched SMG say she was doing both at once. And she shared the anecdote about how Joss surprised her with having to do not only two characters, but three characters at once.

[identity profile] infinitewhale.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 12:57 am (UTC)(link)

I don't know what to tell you about it. :) She flew back and forth during S5 for the first, but the sequel didn't start until April 2003.

[identity profile] local-max.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 12:59 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah. And honestly, Joss knows this. I mean, Buffy season eight is aimed at the fans who know who Joss Whedon is and why his name on a Buffy comic means more than Christopher Golden, right? He gets in Buffy's dream cube. So I think the ambivalence about wanting to share a part of himself and wanting just ot tell a story and to be left alone is coded into the story. Buffy wants the world to be a better place because of her, and she wants to be the one and only, and she wants to open up and she doesn't want people to know the real her.... Layers upon layers.

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 01:09 am (UTC)(link)
I'm glad you'll be around for other stuff -- and I understand wanting a break!

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
Yay for happy! And definitely agree about Buffy feeling ashamed of her p.p. That's why I think her story going forward could be so interesting!

[identity profile] local-max.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
Speaking of going through what she's going through. I was reminded of your previous post about Buffy failing at her first big project. Well, in 2002, Joss planned out the big finish to BtVS, before Lessons was written, and at that point in time he had three shows on the go. Then, Firefly which he loved so much was axed. He soldiered on and finished Buffy season seven though he was heartbroken. Then Angel got cancelled just as he got reinvested in it. He released Serenity and it was well received but dies a quiet death at the box office. He sold his script for Goners and it was never produced. He got a job writing Wonder Woman and he lost it. The only area in which he could get a story out seemed to be comics, so he returned to Buffy, the one live-action story that he chose to end himself. In the series of writing season eight, he gets and loses a new show. He gets Dr. Horrible out and gets Cabin in the Woods made (if not released), so it's not a total failure. But as much as he is famous and well-respected, it's been a string of failures. Are they his fault, or the system's? Is the world not ready for him, or has he lost touch with humanity?

Gah.

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
Hmmm... I disagree on both points.

Buffy's totally retrievable. She gave in after being under a huge amount of pressure, plus with whatever the Twilight event is doing to her. She's fallen. Why can't she come back from that? I'm not tracking your logic here.

Buffy isn't punished for having sex with 'bad boys'. She had a catastrophic first experience with Angel, and replayed it with Parker (who was totally a stand in for Angel). I don't see that she was punished for having sex with Spike. What's happening now is still all about Angel. And her relationship with Angel is fraught with dark matter, so it makes sense that things go kerblooey with him.

Agree, though, that there are pieces that would serve as foreshadowing if Buffy ends up dead or gone.

[identity profile] infinitewhale.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 01:56 am (UTC)(link)
She made her mistakes long before Twilight made their presence felt, already robbing banks that she didn't need to do as they have legitimate sources of income. What pressure was there for her to do that? What was the pressure to make her want to leave a bunch of people to die just to get some vamps? Where was the pressure to suggest Dawn deserved what happened to her? Where is the pressure coming from in the story now, given that according to the writers Glowjuice had a somewhat minimal effect when they were glowing (and they're not glowing now)? And through it all, she has no qualms about any of it, not a trace of guilt outside of how it affects her.

A character can come back from something if you show how they got there. Angel went dark on AtS after Darla, but we *saw* how he got there and we saw his epiphany. Willow could go dark and come back because we saw what happened to her. We saw the change. We don't get any of that with Buffy. Without the bridge from one place to the other, you can't return without an author handwave, and all that leaves you with is an unreliable character. The author's know this; they didn't add that Riley one-shot to elaborate on Angel's motivation for nothing. This is even heightened a little for Buffy since the show states her opinion on these things and she inexplicably goes against it. It's like someone flipped a switch.

Err... I'm pretty sure the Scoobies (society's stand-ins) reactions and commentary were indeed a form of comeuppance. Buffy did bad. Just like Parker. Sleeping with the wrong people as opposed to the right ones. Not that I agree with this, of course, but from a story message standpoint, that's what you can draw, especially when the writers said they were proving a point.

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 02:11 am (UTC)(link)
I'm assuming that Twilight has been in motion from the first page of the comics. The world is all different now. It was just subtle off-ness at first that is now a very unsubtle off-ness. Like Buffy says in the first scene something smells rotton.

Not sure I follow your last sentence. Are you talking about their reaction to Spuffy sex? They aren't some extra-story commentary on what we are supposed to think. They are in-story characters with issues of their own. Bro and I will be hitting that theme a lot in the notes as we go forward. The world didn't end when Buffy had sex with Spike; and for that matter her friends didn't harsh on her for it. What she got was a vampire who went out to fight for a soul and used that soul to save the world. That's not punishment.


Page 2 of 3