maggie2: (Default)
maggie2 ([personal profile] maggie2) wrote2010-09-22 03:34 pm

State of Confusion Prompts Stream of Conscience Rambling

The last few days have been depressing, haven't they?  I feel the need to ramble a bit.

I like the comics.  I think they have a shot at being really great.  Yet when I read Barb's post on the preview pages for #37, and especially the comments, I feel sad.  Not because people disagree with me.  Not because I feel like my own position is being slighted.  But because people I respect, admire and even care about seem wounded by the comics.  And I wonder if every time I write about them it's rubbing salt in wounds.  I don't know what to do with that.  I'm enjoying the note project.  But my ongoing engagement with the fandom is because I think the comics are interesting to think about, and they are what I most want to write about. 

Obviously people can just not read my stuff.  It's just the parting of the ways, that seems sad.  And the feeling that some people might carry on reading my posts even if it makes them unhappy. 

On the Spuffy.  I am first and foremost a Spike fan.  That puts me in a different spot.  In principle, Spike could get trashed the way Angel has been thoroughly trashed.  But I rather more suspect that Spike is playing a role in the comics similar to Faith.  Faith is there as a contrast case for Buffy. Spike is there as a contrast case for Angel.  That decenters Spike some -- or would if that's all we get.  But Spike's story is actually done.  He's died the big glorious death.  I could certainly enjoy and value a story going forward about him coming into his own.  I'd love to see him get a big loving happy ending with someone.  But I don't need that.  He's made his big life choice, and we've seen enough to know that it's real.  Whatever else we get is nice, but I don't need something.  Ergo, I can kick back and enjoy him flying in on his bug ship; sitting around on his bed in white socks; and being quintessentially Spike with his cork example (repeated for Xander's benefit!). 

I'm grateful that he's not coming in all weepy about the Bangel.  I don't mind him dissing Buffy for her lack of education.  She chose Captain Hammer over him and if he wants to get in his digs, I don't have a problem with it.  She's leveled a lot of low blows on him over the years.  And she's been very harsh when he needed a kick in the pants (Get it Done).  I've learned to appreciate what she was doing there.  He's doing the same for her here.  She does need a kick in the pants.

Buffy's character has been put into a very dark light.  I actively like this.  Buffy has always been a little bit self-righteous.  The next step in her story had to be the place where her moral certainty gets battered.  I doubt we leave it here; she'll build back up, and will be a richer character for the journey.   Is it OOC that Buffy has fallen in the manner we see her fall here?  I'll ponder that a bit more below.  But the fact of her fall isn't a problem for me.

I think it's very interesting to see Spike and Buffy together when he's the one with the moral high ground.  From the moment we had the BtBR panel, I've wondered how that would play.  A lot of people assume Spike would be all pro-Buffy no matter what.  I hoped he wouldn't.  I like the way he's handling it here.  He's calling her on what she needs to be called on, but in a way that firmly maintains the connection between them.  The reason I count this as a very positive development in Spuffy is because the ground has shifted in a way that is interesting, and because the aura of old marrieds is so overwhelming.   Even if it's only friendship, these two have come such a phenomenal distance together. 

Do I need more?  Do I need UST or sex or hearts and flowers?  I'd like it, to be sure.  But I think there's something right to the thought that any S/B love relationship really needs Buffy's Bangel issues to be knocked out first.  Were they not, Spike would be re-running his relationship with Dru -- having 'epic' love with a woman for whom he's the second choice.  Buffy needs to have Angel and have it not work before she could get to a real Spuffy relationship that would make me happy.  The comics have created space for that -- since Joss has taken a wrecking ball to Bangel.   I don't think we'll enter into that space -- or at least not any time soon.  But we're going to have real friendship, I think.  Maybe even with benefits.   (The scene is in the bedroom; Georges has said shirtless Spike; neutral readers are catching a whiff of something; Georges has told the Bangels to be very afraid specifically about the Spuffy; it's not impossible).

Perhaps for Spuffy fans who think that the Bangel issues were already history this doesn't work.  But I've always thought that Angel had a stranglehold on Buffy's heart -- and I like that the story is finally dealing with that.  I like that a lot.

One thing that made me very happy about the Spuffy pages we've seen so far is that some non-shipper fans who never much saw the appeal of Spuffy liked them here.  There's a rehabilitation of Spike (and possibly Spuffy) that I appreciate.  It's a relationship that is and was important, even if it ends up not being 'shippy.  And that's now very well established.  And like I said, posts from folks saying they never much liked them before, but like them now make me happy.  I like for Spike to be liked.

That leaves the big looming question.  Joss has turned Angel into Captain Hammer.  He's writing a story about how Twu Wuv 4eva Bangel literally destroys his narrative 'verse.   I love the subtext on those things becoming in your face text.  But.  It's doing so by telling a different sort of story.  The entire 'verse is knocked askew.  I read the Twilight event as literally taking the show and turning it into bad fanfic.  Elements of the story are lifted out, highlighted, and thereby distorted.  It's not just Angel or Bangel.  Xander is practically a Gary Stu.  Willow is a goddess.  Places like England and Germany are now bad cliches.   The entire structure of the 'verse is bent and twisted and distorted and is going to rip apart.  We've been told repeatedly that nothing will be the same in the wake of the finale of season 8.  I read Buffy's distortions in this context.   Angel was always her prince.  But that element of her story is now exaggerated and distorted.  It makes her look like she's regressed.  I think there's a truth to it that's important.  I stand by my "Spuffy reading" (which was really an anti-Bangel reading).  But it's truth told strange.  I want to see how it plays out.  But do understand that the reason it works for me is because it's in the context of this funhouse version of 'the verse.

The meta is inevitably going to be painful for fans.  Buffy's story had been told.   To want to revisit it for more of the same would be to invite a rehash and banality.  Fans may want that, a lot.  But it can't be a good story if it just keeps going because fans want to.  The seed of the story was planted and was fruitful, but it had an expiration date.  The only way the story can go on in a vital way is if the 'verse literally gets ripped apart and remade.  I look forward to seeing what that looks like.  But for everyone invested in the story as it was, Joss is very sharply saying let go.  It's not surprising that a lot of fans *are* letting go.  I'm not sure how I feel about that.  I admire what the story has to do.  I don't like the destruction left in its wake.   I'm especially ambivalent about the naked metaphors about the fandom, which I read as portraying us as at least somewhat malevolent.  I'd say Joss has some issues with us.

My last thought of the afternoon is about Buffy being punished again for sex.  No.  That's not what's happening here.  Her sex with Satsu wasn't punished.  It wasn't going to take cause she wasn't much with the gay and she wasn't open for relationship with her, but the sex was good and nothing bad happened as a consequence.  What we are doing is revisiting Buffy's primal wound around her first sexual experience.  This is all about Angel, not all about sex.  And nota bene: Spike's bed is in a corner just like Angel's bed was.  That's what this is all about. 

Thus my ramblings.  I very much look forward to the last few issues.  I am scared.  If all the 'verse is distorted and trashed, Spike may well catch it bad at some point.  My hope is that he and Faith are there for different reasons.  But who knows?  Meanwhile, I am very sad about the present turmoil in the fandom.  Big hugs all around.  I've got no comfort to offer, and I hate it when people are hurting.

[identity profile] infinitewhale.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 02:19 am (UTC)(link)

In motion? Yes. Directly affecting Buffy's life? I don't see where that's implied. I believe the first time Buffy had direct contact with anyone involved was Amy in issue 2. Many of her wrongdoings had nothing to do with Twilight.

The Scoobs are Buffy's society in her little world, their voices are often that of the writers. Also, I don't see how Xander's rant, either of them, wasn't harshing on her. The world didn't end, but it didn't end with Angel (the first time) either.
ext_15439: (Default)

[identity profile] ubi4soft.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 04:24 am (UTC)(link)
Hey, I love your ramblings and I NEED your ramblings on the comics, the fact that I may have a slightly different opinion when I read them is what fandom is about.

I remember you asking me if I'm happy with Lynch's take that Spike is 8.5 on an Angel scale and I told you that as long as Buffy will mean something to Spike, so will Angel, that he must grow up above both of them and this is something that can be done only by Joss. I think this is what Joss is doing now: Spike is over Buffy (and Angel) so I no longer have hopes for Spuffy.

As for the rest of the comics? I want to see how the story ends. Spike's there, what more can I want?

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 04:38 am (UTC)(link)
That Twilight was in motion from the beginning is my working assumption. That's what all my meta is based on. Could well be wrong -- But it explains a lot if it's right.

The Scoobies are not the voice of the writers. No character is. Agree that Xander ranted at her. Disagree that the rant constitutes 'punishment'.

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 05:28 am (UTC)(link)
Thanks!

Why do you think Spike moving up the scale spells the end for Spuffy?

I hope the story keeps treating Spike well!

[identity profile] infinitewhale.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 05:45 am (UTC)(link)

The Scoobies are not the voice of the writers. No character is.

The writers state things through the characters otherwise the story is meaningless and not about anything. They don't exist by themselves.

Disagree that the rant constitutes 'punishment'.

I consider being made to feel like garbage for personal decisions a punishment. I guess we'll disagree there.
ext_15439: (Default)

[identity profile] ubi4soft.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 06:00 am (UTC)(link)
After that speech in Touched (you're the one..) Spike still had some hopes (maybe fueled by Buffy's response or "does is have to mean anything"). I think now he got over it and if somehow Buffy will make a move on him, he'll reject her.

[identity profile] aycheb.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 08:09 am (UTC)(link)
But...could he really let go of being the one storyteller? And there were people out there abusing the story, as well as people making something beautiful out of it. Wasn't Chosen asking the viewer to be strong and take control? Why is he back in charge, when the story should be in the hands of every viewer?

Joss’s own version of how he came back to write Buffy is rather different and less angst ridden. Scott Allie badgering him about the comic line got him thinking about Buffy and Co again and he heard their voices speaking to him again. I really don’t think it was about showing fans who’s da man, more the fun of reconnecting with his characters. S8 just doesn’t feel to me like he’s destroying his creation, I can sort of see why people might feel that but I don’t. I still love the Buffy he’s writing and I don’t find her out of character, I don’t need to invoke a glow effect to understand why she did what she did and said what she’s said. There’s a joy to S8 and all its absurdities that feel more like someone playing than breaking. It doesn’t feel like the characters or the story being deconstructed, more like they’re being remixed. That said, I’ve used Frankenstein metaphors for remixing (aka vidding) and how it feels before. There always is a certain violence to cutting up and sticking back together but it’s also like dancing, call and response. Joss is dancing with the voices in his head, setting them to different music but underneath all the new harmonies the old song is still there. In the interview with Wizard he said with S8 he wanted to do something similar to “All Star Superman” and that book was pitched as:

Our New Superman approach is an honest attempt to synthesize the best of all previous eras. Our intention is to honor each of Superman’s various interpretations and to use internal story logic as our launching pad for a re-imagined, streamlined 21st century Man of Steel. The ‘cosmic reset’ notion has been replaced by a policy of ‘include and transcend’ with regard to past continuity.

Several of S8’s arcs are re-imaginings of classics from the TV series, most obviously the whole sleeping with Angel destroys the world. It’s being down epic, done comic book style but simple emotional underpinning is still there. Angel wanting to create a happy ever after Twilight for Buffy to live in is absurd and grandiose on a world destroying scale but at heart it’s the same as Xander’s desire in the latest preview to take Dawn away from it all, to make a place for us, to retire from all the world saving. It's very human.

[identity profile] francy-m79.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 09:19 am (UTC)(link)
That was a great read, Maggie! I always enjoy reading your stuff!

That sad, I'm very much in turmoil. I have avoided anything Btvs/fandom-y for years. I thought I was completely over Btvs (although I still loved Spuffy dearly...my favourite couple/storyline ever), but then, recently, I did a Btvs/Ats rewatch, and got sucked in in the 'verse all over again.

Then, I read that in issue 36 Spike was back in the picture (it's difficult to avoid the comics completely, when you are a member of a Buffy forum! LOL ), and I started reading about the comics to see what happened, and what was going to happen with Spike. And boy, do I wish I hadn't bothered!

I liked Chosen. It wasn't perfect, but I thought it was the absolutely perfect way to end the show (a hopeful future for Buffy and the gang, both Spuffy and Bangel validated, freedom for the viewer to imagine where the characters would go from there, etc...). The show should have been left alone, and the comics should never have been made. I will never change my mind about that!

But the comics exist, and I don't like pretty much anything about them, judging from what I have read around. I am not one of those people who can disregard them, though, because I understand they are considered canon.
Beside the murdering of Spuffy (we will never have another "reunion scene". We got what we got, and it was the worst possible), we find a verse in which things are even more troubled and depressing than they were before...so much for Buffy's hopeful smile at the end of Chosen. These stupid comics are undoing everything that season 7 had achieved, for me.

I'm trying to put some distance and not be so invested... but these comics are really making me unhappy. I am trying to be ok with a Spuffy friendship, but no matter how much I try, it's not enough for me. I don't expect a happily ever after, but I would like Buffy and Spike to make love (or even just kiss) even only just once, when it actually matters.. not when Spike was soulless and Buffy was using him, but when both of them want it for the right reasons. I think Spike would deserve that, and the Spuffy fans would as well.

But I guess it's pretty impossible, as long as Buffy sees Angel as her first choice, and the love of her life. *barf*

Sorry for the poem, I haven't talked about Btvs so much in years! LOL *wants to go back to bubble of unawareness*

[identity profile] local-max.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 04:54 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree with what you say here, but I don't think it's incompatible with what I was saying above. You've ably pointed out repeatedly about how much season eight comes back to Buffy's fame. I think that the other side to the fame is that I think Buffy does at some level want to stay in control. She wants to give up her power, but she also revels in it (c.f. Twilight Part 1 especially) and I think she likes being exceptional. Joss has been on "the difficult second album" for many years, in terms of connecting to a mass audience. Chosen was supposed to be the end of Joss' involvement in Buffy's story, and of Buffy's being the One and Only, but years later they're both back. I think the parallel works, regardless of the original way that season eight started. (You can argue Joss is Xander too. I just reread The Long Way Home and like the way he mentions, "When duty calls, you don't get to screen." Allie asked Joss to have permission to continue a comic book, and Joss felt some pull to continue doing it, even though he had been, like Xander, somewhat out of the biz.)

I do think that Joss' destroying the story is maybe overstating the case. But the remixing is not just a matter of turning it up to epic, it also involves exposing the silliness AND the emotional underpinning that's always been there. It's like a Douglas Sirk movie, where it's being played straight and being mercilessly self-mocking at the same time. I've watched All that Heaven Allows and not cracked a smile, and Imitation of Life in a Film 101 class and never laughed harder; it just requires a slight turn of the head. The show had some of this ridiculousness (especially in things like OMWF) but not quite on the same level. So I think there is a deliberate distancing effect in having Angel turning into a Hammer-like caricature (though still recognizably Angel, just with most of his guilt and reluctance removed), having all the steam trains still running in Germany, having all the forest creatures everywhere, etc. Overdosing us on Wonder before we get to the Seed. In-story and out-of-story seem to be merging here. It's not a criticism, and I can turn my head and read the story straight, but I think it is off in deliberate ways. Sorry if I can't articulate it very well.

But anyway I agree on the point that the emotional underpinnings are still there to the story.

[identity profile] calturner.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 05:51 pm (UTC)(link)
You always write such interesting and insightful posts, Maggie, and this one is no exception. Thank you! :)

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 06:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I guess what I find most hopeful about the comics is that it's dealing with the problem that Buffy sees Angel as the love of her life. I'd hoped in the very last minute in the Chosen, she'd seen that wasn't true. But it was never clear to me. I don't mind a story where she deals with that head on. It makes sense to me that she'd need some experience to really see that he's not. Her story had been that she couldn't be with the perfect guy -- and what's going to change that except being with that guy and finding out that it's really not perfect.

We'll see.

I hadn't been able to imagine any first reunion scene between Spike and Buffy that worked for me, so this one actually is OK -- because by having it be a non-reunion scene it sort of implies that they are so together on some level that they just pick up without a beat.

I'm willing to bet money we get some physical contact between the two. We'll know one way or the other soon enough.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts! I totally get where you are coming from, even if I don't see it the same.

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 06:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks!!

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 06:17 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think so. Spike having his own moral center doesn't mean that he won't still love Buffy. At least I don't see why it'd have to be that way. Besides, even if she's temporarily not what she should be, her best self is spectacular, and I think Spike's quite capable of seeing what she can be, and not focus on her present difficulties.

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 06:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Word. And Sirk is totally an influence. Joss is the one who insisted that the watcher guy in AtS 5 be named after him.

[identity profile] aycheb.livejournal.com 2010-09-23 10:31 pm (UTC)(link)
But the remixing is not just a matter of turning it up to epic, it also involves exposing the silliness AND the emotional underpinning that's always been there. It's like a Douglas Sirk movie, where it's being played straight and being mercilessly self-mocking at the same time.

Joss has always said that BtVS (of all his shows) had a musical sensibility and that works very like Sirk. It's at once utterly ridiculous that people are breaking into song and utterly true to how they feel. I guess I've always felt that knife edge, that head turn away from absurdity in Buffy. The world-building has never held together as world-building but that's been a strength not a problem to me. The comics don't feel so different. Angel always was Captain Hammer, I don't need to be told that Buffy is his Penny, that's been clear from the start, I think she knows it too. But he's not just the guy who thinks he signaled her with his eyes, he is someone who needs her to save him in a real human way too. So I wonder whether where this is going isn't deconstructing the Bella/Edward of B/A but the Jane/Rochester and that's more interesting because Buffy needing to save people isn't a weakness to get over, it's a strength, it's part of what makes her heroic. There's a genuine dilemma there a very Jossian one about passion. Can't live with it, can't live without it.

[identity profile] shipperx.livejournal.com 2010-09-24 04:17 pm (UTC)(link)
A few days late but...

And I wonder if every time I write about them it's rubbing salt in wounds.

Here's my thought. Our journals are our own. We need to be able to voice our opinions in our own journals. That's what they are for. And, for all we do need civility and kindness in fandom. We do need compassion. I think it's too much to ask of ourselves -- or of anyone -- to place responsibility for someone else's emotional state on us. (Err... did the way I state that make any sense?) We can't really control how other individuals feel at least not in matters where we're stating our own reaction or thoughts about a book or movie or comic, media. etc. These are texts and media that are going to provoke different reactions and everyone is allowed their feelings. It's a bit unrealistic (and I'd venture to say even unfair) to expect everyone censor themselves for fear that their geniune reaction might cause someone else to react badly.

Which, again, is not to say that civility, kindness, and compassion are unimportant. Heck, they're essential. It's the grease that allows the machinery of civilization and fandom to function. It is good to cut each other some slack, to allow for differences of opinion, to behave in a compassionate and civil manner as much as we can. But we really cannot be responsible for anyone's emotions but our own. And if we're talking in our own LJ and are expressing our reactions, feelings, and opinions then I think we need to realize we're allowed to do that... and others are too. If someone doesn't want to read it, if our reactions brings about a distressed response from someone else, then there's always the choice to step back and not read. There are filters and friending and all the ways we need to shield ourselves from what is distressing. If there isn't name calling, vendetta pushing, offensive of an individual and personal nature, etc. then we need to allow people the space to express themselves in their own journals and to understand that that is their space.

Basically, we should all strive to be considerate, but it's an unnecssary and unfair expectation that people need take responsibility for the emotional response of the rest of the world. We need to leave room for honesty and have empathy enough to understand that we can feel differently about things -- and express it -- and also understand that everyone has feelings here and opinions. And, while we may not feel the same or hold the same opinion about something, that's okay. We can't expect everyone to go around censoring themselves because... that sort of defeats the purpose of LJ. Civility is good, walking around on eggshells fearing the reactions of others... kinda stifling.

I'm interested in opinions and ideas even when they don't align perfectly with my own. We learn things that way and gain perspective, and even if it doesn't necessarily change how we view things, it allows us insight into how others do. :)

And I genuinely like (and agree) with much of what you have to say here. I do.

RE: the preview, I didn't have much of a reaction beyond the text of it because the preview is but a snippet. I actually would like to know more before coming up with a reaction... because the Jossverse has made me paranoid cautious.
Edited 2010-09-24 16:47 (UTC)

[identity profile] shipperx.livejournal.com 2010-09-24 05:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Speaking as an old-timer... this is tame by comparison. Unfortunately. :)

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-24 05:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Or do we say we're making progress?!

[identity profile] shipperx.livejournal.com 2010-09-24 05:43 pm (UTC)(link)
I always look at Spike's body language at "Does it have to mean something...?" And come away with the feeling that it's at this point that hope died. The love didn't. The hope did.

But that's just my own take on the scene.

[identity profile] local-max.livejournal.com 2010-09-25 02:25 am (UTC)(link)
I agree that BtVS was always on that knife edge. I disagree that season eight doesn't push it further. But really, it's a matter of degree and not of kind. A lot of people view season eight as pushing way past the boundaries of the show, and so we get world-ending spacefrakking and constant flying and Xacula and Centaur!Dawn instead of soul-loss frakking and Willow hovering in moments of extreme power and Xanya and Key!Dawn. The latter set are still huge, extreme angst but somehow the first set are even more so to me. I guess it's not easy to articulate why.

Angel always was Captain Hammer, I don't need to be told that Buffy is his Penny, that's been clear from the start, I think she knows it too.

Angel was always Captain Hammer, but he also brooded and felt guilty about his massive arrays of sins. This Angel does in the Riley one-shot, yes, but by "Twilight" and "Last Gleaming" he's very blase about having nearly ended the world. Angel in the past would have at least felt the need to do angsty voice-over pushups ala Redefinition. It's not that that isn't itself very silly, but it's still at least a more layered bit of silliness, some indications of at least attempts at introspection, that the current Angel doesn't have. Who knows, maybe we'll get some soon. But again, I see it more as amping up Angel's Hammer-ness until it's impossible to ignore, rather than just reproducing Angel's absolutely normal behaviour.

You might be right about the Jane/Rochester but my Jane Eyre knowledge is fuzzy (read: nonexistent, though I did see I Walked with a Zombie which is supposed to be a quasi-remake, with zombies, prefiguring Pride and Prejudice and Zombies by sixty years).

and that's more interesting because Buffy needing to save people isn't a weakness to get over, it's a strength, it's part of what makes her heroic. There's a genuine dilemma there a very Jossian one about passion. Can't live with it, can't live without it.

I do very much like this point. I don't know if I can see Buffy's actions in Twilight as being primarily motivated by a selfless desire to help Angel by letting him try to save her. But maybe if I tilt my head on a reread it'll come through.

[identity profile] local-max.livejournal.com 2010-09-25 02:28 am (UTC)(link)
The last message should read not "huge extreme angst" but "huge extreme ridiculousness" or something similar, not sure why I said angst. And I want to clarify that Angel's angsty guilt is not necessarily a positive, but it's part of what makes his character complex and not a Hammer clone and I think it's missing now.

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-25 07:55 am (UTC)(link)
I usually feel free to speak my mind. I think what I'm trying to say here is that it just hurts to see folks hurting - and the comics are making folks hurt. I haven't felt any pressure from anywhere to censor myself. And I'm not going to censor myself. It's an internal thing. If people are snarking and stuff, I can fire away with pleasure. It's when oxes are gored. But yeah, at the end of the day we're all in charge of our own selves and our own reactions.

Re: the preview: I understand the caution. All bets are off, and it'd be foolish to kick back and think we're somehow going to avoid Joss's wrecking ball. But Jeanty told the Bangels to be afraid of the Spuffy, and I keep looking at that bed... which I do not think is randomly drawn to be the spitting image of the Bangel bed of lost innocence.

[identity profile] treadingthedark.livejournal.com 2010-09-25 04:20 pm (UTC)(link)
These comics have done nothing but hurt my Spuffy heart from the beginning. The lack of Spike from the get go, even in Buffy's head, the Satsu, the Bander, the Spacefrak, the bitchy reunion, every word out of Allie and Jeanty's mouth, one hurt after another.
In my opinion, there is no saving it anymore. And I expect the worst, so that I can not be disappointed any more. Hopefully. I know, there is always a lower place.

Saying that, the things that have made me feel better are laughing about it, with penguins, broccoli and cake, parodies, or ignoring it and pretending it doesn't exist and reading fic that does the same, and reading hopeful, optimistic reviews that find some good, although not really letting myself believe them.

I want all of these things. They all helped, and I selfishly don't want anyone's voice to be silenced. Unfortunately voices have been silenced and that hurts too.

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-25 08:21 pm (UTC)(link)
I think we all need to enthusiastically agree about the greatness of penguins.

About the Spuffy of it... It's too OTT, the wrecking of Spuffy, for that to be the last word. If you want to write off Spike, you mention him early on. Buffy makes it clear she cares, but not like that. It's plausible and it's finished.

Buffy may not heart Spike. I've always thought it was an open question. But she's not callously indifferent. So all the things you point to as stuff that is hurtful to your Spuffy heart, I find annoyingly positive for mine. (Annoyingly because it can't go as well as I see it going right now -- and the signs I read are very positive). Because we know she cares, her lack of sign of care means she cares a great deal. Spike doesn't get the big last minute entrance if he's a character with little emotional resonance for Buffy. On the contrary.

I share your sadness about voices that have gone silent. As much as I like the comics and have hopes for them, I hate what they are doing to the fandom.

Page 3 of 3