maggie2: (Default)
maggie2 ([personal profile] maggie2) wrote2010-09-22 03:34 pm

State of Confusion Prompts Stream of Conscience Rambling

The last few days have been depressing, haven't they?  I feel the need to ramble a bit.

I like the comics.  I think they have a shot at being really great.  Yet when I read Barb's post on the preview pages for #37, and especially the comments, I feel sad.  Not because people disagree with me.  Not because I feel like my own position is being slighted.  But because people I respect, admire and even care about seem wounded by the comics.  And I wonder if every time I write about them it's rubbing salt in wounds.  I don't know what to do with that.  I'm enjoying the note project.  But my ongoing engagement with the fandom is because I think the comics are interesting to think about, and they are what I most want to write about. 

Obviously people can just not read my stuff.  It's just the parting of the ways, that seems sad.  And the feeling that some people might carry on reading my posts even if it makes them unhappy. 

On the Spuffy.  I am first and foremost a Spike fan.  That puts me in a different spot.  In principle, Spike could get trashed the way Angel has been thoroughly trashed.  But I rather more suspect that Spike is playing a role in the comics similar to Faith.  Faith is there as a contrast case for Buffy. Spike is there as a contrast case for Angel.  That decenters Spike some -- or would if that's all we get.  But Spike's story is actually done.  He's died the big glorious death.  I could certainly enjoy and value a story going forward about him coming into his own.  I'd love to see him get a big loving happy ending with someone.  But I don't need that.  He's made his big life choice, and we've seen enough to know that it's real.  Whatever else we get is nice, but I don't need something.  Ergo, I can kick back and enjoy him flying in on his bug ship; sitting around on his bed in white socks; and being quintessentially Spike with his cork example (repeated for Xander's benefit!). 

I'm grateful that he's not coming in all weepy about the Bangel.  I don't mind him dissing Buffy for her lack of education.  She chose Captain Hammer over him and if he wants to get in his digs, I don't have a problem with it.  She's leveled a lot of low blows on him over the years.  And she's been very harsh when he needed a kick in the pants (Get it Done).  I've learned to appreciate what she was doing there.  He's doing the same for her here.  She does need a kick in the pants.

Buffy's character has been put into a very dark light.  I actively like this.  Buffy has always been a little bit self-righteous.  The next step in her story had to be the place where her moral certainty gets battered.  I doubt we leave it here; she'll build back up, and will be a richer character for the journey.   Is it OOC that Buffy has fallen in the manner we see her fall here?  I'll ponder that a bit more below.  But the fact of her fall isn't a problem for me.

I think it's very interesting to see Spike and Buffy together when he's the one with the moral high ground.  From the moment we had the BtBR panel, I've wondered how that would play.  A lot of people assume Spike would be all pro-Buffy no matter what.  I hoped he wouldn't.  I like the way he's handling it here.  He's calling her on what she needs to be called on, but in a way that firmly maintains the connection between them.  The reason I count this as a very positive development in Spuffy is because the ground has shifted in a way that is interesting, and because the aura of old marrieds is so overwhelming.   Even if it's only friendship, these two have come such a phenomenal distance together. 

Do I need more?  Do I need UST or sex or hearts and flowers?  I'd like it, to be sure.  But I think there's something right to the thought that any S/B love relationship really needs Buffy's Bangel issues to be knocked out first.  Were they not, Spike would be re-running his relationship with Dru -- having 'epic' love with a woman for whom he's the second choice.  Buffy needs to have Angel and have it not work before she could get to a real Spuffy relationship that would make me happy.  The comics have created space for that -- since Joss has taken a wrecking ball to Bangel.   I don't think we'll enter into that space -- or at least not any time soon.  But we're going to have real friendship, I think.  Maybe even with benefits.   (The scene is in the bedroom; Georges has said shirtless Spike; neutral readers are catching a whiff of something; Georges has told the Bangels to be very afraid specifically about the Spuffy; it's not impossible).

Perhaps for Spuffy fans who think that the Bangel issues were already history this doesn't work.  But I've always thought that Angel had a stranglehold on Buffy's heart -- and I like that the story is finally dealing with that.  I like that a lot.

One thing that made me very happy about the Spuffy pages we've seen so far is that some non-shipper fans who never much saw the appeal of Spuffy liked them here.  There's a rehabilitation of Spike (and possibly Spuffy) that I appreciate.  It's a relationship that is and was important, even if it ends up not being 'shippy.  And that's now very well established.  And like I said, posts from folks saying they never much liked them before, but like them now make me happy.  I like for Spike to be liked.

That leaves the big looming question.  Joss has turned Angel into Captain Hammer.  He's writing a story about how Twu Wuv 4eva Bangel literally destroys his narrative 'verse.   I love the subtext on those things becoming in your face text.  But.  It's doing so by telling a different sort of story.  The entire 'verse is knocked askew.  I read the Twilight event as literally taking the show and turning it into bad fanfic.  Elements of the story are lifted out, highlighted, and thereby distorted.  It's not just Angel or Bangel.  Xander is practically a Gary Stu.  Willow is a goddess.  Places like England and Germany are now bad cliches.   The entire structure of the 'verse is bent and twisted and distorted and is going to rip apart.  We've been told repeatedly that nothing will be the same in the wake of the finale of season 8.  I read Buffy's distortions in this context.   Angel was always her prince.  But that element of her story is now exaggerated and distorted.  It makes her look like she's regressed.  I think there's a truth to it that's important.  I stand by my "Spuffy reading" (which was really an anti-Bangel reading).  But it's truth told strange.  I want to see how it plays out.  But do understand that the reason it works for me is because it's in the context of this funhouse version of 'the verse.

The meta is inevitably going to be painful for fans.  Buffy's story had been told.   To want to revisit it for more of the same would be to invite a rehash and banality.  Fans may want that, a lot.  But it can't be a good story if it just keeps going because fans want to.  The seed of the story was planted and was fruitful, but it had an expiration date.  The only way the story can go on in a vital way is if the 'verse literally gets ripped apart and remade.  I look forward to seeing what that looks like.  But for everyone invested in the story as it was, Joss is very sharply saying let go.  It's not surprising that a lot of fans *are* letting go.  I'm not sure how I feel about that.  I admire what the story has to do.  I don't like the destruction left in its wake.   I'm especially ambivalent about the naked metaphors about the fandom, which I read as portraying us as at least somewhat malevolent.  I'd say Joss has some issues with us.

My last thought of the afternoon is about Buffy being punished again for sex.  No.  That's not what's happening here.  Her sex with Satsu wasn't punished.  It wasn't going to take cause she wasn't much with the gay and she wasn't open for relationship with her, but the sex was good and nothing bad happened as a consequence.  What we are doing is revisiting Buffy's primal wound around her first sexual experience.  This is all about Angel, not all about sex.  And nota bene: Spike's bed is in a corner just like Angel's bed was.  That's what this is all about. 

Thus my ramblings.  I very much look forward to the last few issues.  I am scared.  If all the 'verse is distorted and trashed, Spike may well catch it bad at some point.  My hope is that he and Faith are there for different reasons.  But who knows?  Meanwhile, I am very sad about the present turmoil in the fandom.  Big hugs all around.  I've got no comfort to offer, and I hate it when people are hurting.
elisi: Edwin and Charles (Bangel4evah by zanthinegirl)

[personal profile] elisi 2010-09-22 07:54 pm (UTC)(link)
But because people I respect, admire and even care about seem wounded by the comics. And I wonder if every time I write about them it's rubbing salt in wounds.
One, if I cared, and took them seriously, the comics would hurt me very much. However I would be (and am) happy that others enjoy them, and find something worthwhile in them. And *I* worry that my snark upsets those who *do* like them...

ETA: Just one thing (shouldn't be here at all) - re. the position of Spike's bed. I doubt it has any significance AT ALL, since I very much doubt Jeanty bothered to look up Angel's bed. Similiarly, I can't see it crossing Joss' mind to include something like that. Sorry. But if it makes you happy, then don't let my cynicism stop you! :)
Edited 2010-09-22 19:59 (UTC)

[identity profile] pamsblau.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 07:58 pm (UTC)(link)
I know what you mean. I'm happy about the comics. I'm happy about Spike and Spike/Buffy. The story works for me and i'm sorry for my friends for whom it doesn't.
I have been feeling really crappy all day. The Spuffy fandom seems so disunited right now. It's sad.:(
shapinglight: (Default)

[personal profile] shapinglight 2010-09-22 08:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Georges has told the Bangels to be very afraid specifically about the Spuffy; it's not impossible).

He has? When did he say that?

I'm in an odd position vis-a-vis the comic, in that I don't really like it and don't think there's nearly as much in it as you do, but because it's Joss and Spike I can't quite look away and go on hoping for - well, I don't know what really.

I've tried to keep my lack of squee to myself for a long time now, but since Spike came back I can't do that any more, sadly.

I hope I haven't hurt anyone's feelings with what I've said, but most of all I'm sorry that anyone's feelings had to be hurt over something like this.

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 08:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Q&A #13:

21. bamph: What do you think Buffy/Angel shippers should feel now after issue 35 and what's coming up and with the arrival of Spike on the scene now? Be as vague as you want.

Georges: Afraid. Be very afraid.

***

People need to express what people need to express. Like you, I'm just sad about all the hurt feelings (all over). (Though I do wish you could spend a day seeing the comics the way I do -- one always wants to share a squee!)

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 08:13 pm (UTC)(link)
:hugs: These things usually do come and go, right? I hope it'll blow over. What worries me is that the comics are going to keep coming, and they provoke strong reactions. :(

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 08:15 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm glad you have distance! We'll see what happens! No worry about your cynicism though -- I totally see where you're coming from!!

BTW: I still love that icon. The comics at least gave us that!
Edited 2010-09-22 20:20 (UTC)

[identity profile] local-max.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 08:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Since I'm not part of Spike or Spuffy fandom, I don't have much to add, though unsurprisingly I'm on board with your read of the Spuffy interactions. In particular I agree that his straight talk, calling her a moron is the equivalent to Buffy's words to him in "Get it Done." And that for Buffy and Spike (or Buffy and anyone!) to have a real chance, Buffy's Angel issues really do need to be laid to rest. The big kiss hello in EoD/Chosen does suggest that she wasn't over him then, much as she acknowledged flaws in their relationship. And Joss has to know that Bangels still took that kiss as confirmation that they were always and forever. So it's understandable that he's giving them a last hurrah before destroying them.

I agree too that Joss isn't being nice to fandom. Shadowkat in particular has laid out the perspective of why the season can be seen as arrogant and immature of Whedon, biting the hands of the fans that feed him. I think Joss really appreciates the fans, but maybe he wants to reclaim the story and needs to do so through fannish means? I like the story, but I can't deny that it looks a little bit like it's supposed to be painful and not just in the usual narrative ways, and feel ambivalent about that.

And nota bene: Spike's bed is in a corner just like Angel's bed was. That's what this is all about.

N.B. This is Buffy's version of the replay. Angel's was in AtS--note how when he sleeps with Darla, the shooting is the same, but with blue sheets instead of red, depression instead of passion. But it looks like Angel isn't over those issues, since he's back here (though yes, his story is primarily about Buffy and only secondarily about him this season). Colour-wise, I like the movement from red (Innocence) to blue (Reprise) to beige (Last Gleaming)--beige is a much more neutral colour, neither entirely hot nor cold.

The entire 'verse is knocked askew. I read the Twilight event as literally taking the show and turning it into bad fanfic. Elements of the story are lifted out, highlighted, and thereby distorted. It's not just Angel or Bangel. Xander is practically a Gary Stu. Willow is a goddess. Places like England and Germany are now bad cliches. The entire structure of the 'verse is bent and twisted and distorted and is going to rip apart. We've been told repeatedly that nothing will be the same in the wake of the finale of season 8. I read Buffy's distortions in this context.

And that's worrying for all involved too isn't it? Bangel/Angel is what got hit the hardest. But I think you're right about Xander and about Willow. You can see it with Giles too, when he becomes boring exposition man in Safe and in Twilight--despite Emmie's reasonable protests, Safe's writing him as "British" and boring might actually work as part of the story. Don't know where this is leading. Right now the thing that's getting to me is how much I don't want anyone to die.
next_to_normal: (Buffy in class)

[personal profile] next_to_normal 2010-09-22 08:41 pm (UTC)(link)
You know, Maggie, I think this post just helped me land on a metaphor for how I feel. :)

Joss is Angel. He just destroyed the world, out of carelessness or stupidity or misguided good intentions, maybe a combination of all three, I'm not sure. But, you know, I kind of liked the world the way it was, and now it's besieged by demons because of him. He doesn't get to swoop in and save me from those demons and act like it's not his fault we're in this mess in the first place. Maybe some people will be able to forgive him, if it all works out in the end, and maybe they'll call him a hero for saving the day - and hey, maybe a few people even want to space-fuck him because they're under the influence of something - but given all the destruction that's been wrought, I still think it would've been better if he'd just left well enough alone. Buffy was doing fine without him.

I have definitely found certain opinions to be hurtful or rubbing salt in the wound, but for what it's worth, your posts aren't among them. And although I'm not feeling very chatty about BtVS anymore, I want you to know that I am following along and enjoying your note project.

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 08:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Intersting bit on Giles as exposition man. Anything that can redeem Safe even a little bit is good.

Beige is interesting to ponder as well.

Also, glad you share my ambivalence about the meta-commentary on fandom. I really both love it and appalled by it. At the same time.
Edited 2010-09-22 20:45 (UTC)

[identity profile] lusciousxander.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 08:44 pm (UTC)(link)
I understand how you feel. I feel the same way sometimes, especially since I've always liked S8. I try hard to remind myself that everybody has a right to voice their opinions -good or bad- and I just have to let the bad slip and not let it get me down. I've stopped reading reviews written by fans who dislike the comics -most of them are people I love and respect. Reading those reviews will only hurt, and I'm here to have fun. I guess it's the best way to avoid pain and disappointment.

I hate my hate for S7 and right now I know what it's like for those who like it to read my snark and rants about it.

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 08:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Glad you have a useful metaphor! Though I don't think it's carelessness or stupidity. I think it's deliberate. Angel might be destroying the world by accident. Joss is doing it on purpose. A lot will depend on how he rebuilds it, but for folks who liked it as it was, why wouldn't you be angry?

You're much missed, but I'm glad my own posts aren't part of the problem for you. And glad you like the note project!

I'm reading your feed from DW. I comment less readily cause it's a few clicks more complicated - but I'll get over that at some point and have a say from time to time!
Edited 2010-09-22 20:49 (UTC)

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 08:48 pm (UTC)(link)
We all care so much, don't we?

I wasn't in the fandom back in the day -- but I imagine it was all every bit as divisive as this is...

[identity profile] jamalov29.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 08:51 pm (UTC)(link)
But my ongoing engagement with the fandom is because I think the comics are interesting to think about, and they are what I most want to write about. I think it's very fine like it is and I hope you will always keep the pleasure of writing down your thoughts. My own involvement is more about the TV show , but I love to believe that we all take something valuable from the verse and that is all that matters.
Like I wrote in my post , while comics aren't my thing, I wish to all those who like them to get a satisfying reading experience, and I mean it.
And I wonder if every time I write about them it's rubbing salt in wounds. I don't know what to do with that.
There are a number of wide array of reactions/ sensibilities in fandom so I guess there's always someone bound to be hurt by what someone else is saying . This makes me sad but what can we do? We try as much as possible not to sound defensive or angry in some circumstances ,but the written word isn't always able to convey exactly what we're feeling inside.
So no , it's not rubbing salt , it's just you expressing something that is important to you when you write about the comics and your Spike's love and it should remain that way , for you and everybody.

I respect everyone's tastes , even those far away from mine.
If the B/A crowd is happy at the end , good for them. If B/S shippers( or some parts of them )are content with what they get , it will be nice too.
If the non-shippers are satisfied, the pleasure is mine as well.

I don't understand how things have escalated again , I only wish they hadn't and that people enjoy what they want to.
Edited 2010-09-22 20:55 (UTC)
next_to_normal: (Default)

[personal profile] next_to_normal 2010-09-22 08:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Though I don't think it's carelessness or stupidity. I think it's deliberate.

Heh. Deliberate and stupid are not mutually exclusive. :)
next_to_normal: (Default)

[personal profile] next_to_normal 2010-09-22 08:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Blast. Now that I'm basic, I can't edit anymore. Anyway, I'm always happy to have you at DW! :)

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 08:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Point! But personally I think it's really cool to rip the story from the inside out. It's not a move I've seen before.

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 09:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I adore this post.

As you know, I'm more Spuffy-positive than you are, but I agree with about 90% of this and think it's insightful and great. And I hope you would never stop writing about S8. People can skip over it quite easily if they want to avoid it, and this is your journal, after all (though of course it's great that you take others into account). Besides, I love hearing your S8 thoughts. Your opinion is among the most valuable to me and you always make me think when you're writing about it. Keep on writing, I say!

I'm kind of with [livejournal.com profile] local_max feeling that this could be genius but it also is pretty self-indulgent and immature. But I'm withholding judgment until the season ends, and I'm not so much a fan of Joss personally as I am of some of his writing, so even if I do come out of this thinking less of him, that doesn't really matter.

Was this comment coherent at all? Probably not. Sorry about that!

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks for the comment, and I very much liked your post on the subject. I share your sadness about the way things have escalated for the moment.

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 09:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Very coherent! There might be self-indulgence and immaturity in the mix. But I think there's a serious artistic reason to want to destroy the 'verse -- it's the fruition of Lie to Me. My real ambivalence is that it necessarily hurts good people. And yeah, there's a side of mockery that really isn't nice. So depending on how it all plays out, my feelings about Joss will likely be much more ambivalent when all is said and done. It's not surprising. Like Buffy he's a little bit self-righteous. Even more so. And who knows, maybe he's calling himself on all that in writing this story as well. He did put himself into the book as a dog obsessed with his balls. More to the point, all the god-stuff is about him.

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 09:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, that's a relief!

It's the mockery I'm mostly concerned about. And the possibility that he wrote this to wrench the Buffyverse out of the hands of fans. If he just wants to dismantle the 'verse because of that artistic reason or because he thinks it's interesting or any other reason, I'm fine with that. But if it's an actual reaction to fandom? Then that crosses a line for me. I guess there's no way to technically know for sure, though, unless he becomes really obvious in the last few installments.

And who knows, maybe he's calling himself on all that in writing this story as well. He did put himself into the book as a dog obsessed with his balls. More to the point, all the god-stuff is about him.

That would make me feel better about him. And self-righteous: yes.

[identity profile] eilowyn.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 09:17 pm (UTC)(link)
This was a hard post to comment on mostly because so much stuff was there for me to highlight and "word" on. I'm finally enjoying the comics (I think I'll be posting my definitive take on them tonight, with my entire history with them recounted down to the mean nicknames my roommate and I called posters on Buffyforums during #34's launch), but I'm someone who's been bipolar about the comics from the beginning. Because of that, I have all the sympathy in the world for the people who aren't enjoying them, because I've been there. Like Lauren said above, I've found them entirely self-indulgent and immature, but that hasn't stopped me from enjoying the current outlook now that we know Buffy's OOC behavior is so glaringly bad it has to be a plot point.

It could very well be genius, and even if it isn't, there are people I likely wouldn't have friended if I wasn't curious about them. So I do think the comics have served a good purpose, even if they wind up crashing and burning in the end.

[identity profile] eilowyn.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)
I do like your explanation on the meta level about destroying the 'verse - it does feel like a reboot becomes necessary when things get so mired in mythology that it's impossible not to contradict something with every move.

[identity profile] penny-lane-42.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 09:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Your thoughts are my thoughts. As usual. Because yes: I totally get both sides, because I've been on both sides. So I have sympathy for everyone.

And yes! Just think of the comics as our matchmaker! You and I might never have found each other (and Enver!) without them!

[identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)
I look forward to your post! I've never gotten to hating them, but I've done some spells of WTF. And glad that friendships are being made!

[identity profile] angearia.livejournal.com 2010-09-22 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree too that Joss isn't being nice to fandom.

No, he's not. #33/34 gutted me like a fish and left me flailing in a tailspin for months until a month ago when I finally realized I wasn't hurt anymore.


You can see it with Giles too, when he becomes boring exposition man in Safe and in Twilight--despite Emmie's reasonable protests, Safe's writing him as "British" and boring might actually work as part of the story.

LOL! Now you have fanwanked the bad writing by Krueger. I can accept that. Just like how I can accept that SMG lost her voice from flying to Australia to shoot Scooby Doo while shooting Season 7, but that this works in the sense that Buffy is so tired in Empty Places/Touched that she has no voice left.

Page 1 of 3