(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-08 05:30 pm (UTC)
I wouldn't go so far as to say that they're robbing Buffy of her free will. Most of the plausible paths toward her robbing bank involved her exercise of free will. What they are saying is that how she exercised her free will is irrelevant to the consequences. Robbing banks is the same choice regardless of the circumstances behind it or the motivations driving one towards it. And yeah, in some sense, that means that it really just happened to her, since we're saying it doesn't matter how she came to chose it. So this is just splitting hairs with you (or me just saying the same thing in my own way). By telling us that Buffy's motives don't matter, they're telling us that she doesn't matter as an agent, even though they aren't denying that she's there by her own agency.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

maggie2: (Default)
maggie2

September 2010

S M T W T F S
    1 234
5 678 91011
12 131415 161718
19 2021 22 232425
26 272829 30  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags