Living with Plot Contrivances: or how I learned to (mostly) stop worrying and love Spike's story

[maggie2]

So sometimes the plot has to bend around other things the writers are after.   In a seven year run on TV like the one BtVS enjoyed that has to happen a few times.  Seth Green decides to leave suddenly, and the story bends around his departure.   Sometimes the bends work.  Other times they are, shall we say, less than obviously natural to the flow of the story.

There are two that come to mind with regard to Spike's story.   The first is the non-staking of Spike in season 4 and especially in early season 5.  The second is Spike's non-phone call to Buffy in season 5 in Angel.    It's obvious why they had to happen.  In season 4, they wanted Spike on the show and him getting dusted would have interfered with the plan.  On AtS, they wanted Spike to stick around in LA, and they presumably didn't want a Buffy story line to stomp all over the fifth season of Angel's show.   I think both work better than most people think, but I'm not sure I'm entirely satisfied with them.

1.  Spike's non-stakage.  I think this hits on important themes that are already being raised in the show in general and in season 4 in particular.   The presence of the Initiative calls into question whether demons are flat out unprotected by any moral rules at all.  There's storyline pressure, especially around Oz, to say that demonic beings are not without moral standing simply because of their demonic nature.   A simple "kill all demons" rule is inadequte.   That simple rule was also under pressure over on season 1 of AtS.   Once Spike is rendered harmless, the story's own development would make killing him difficult. 

I'd add that there's a meta question floating around about what demons are supposed to be metaphors for.  I've argued this before in my meta on Lie to Me.  If demons stand in for our various traumas, dark emotions and angst, then a story about a girl slaying them is really a story about a girl struggling with life's darkness.  But once demons become persons, the question is raised about what distinguishes a slayer from a killer.  In our actual world, there are no persons who are subject to any kind of "kill at will' rule based solely on what they are.  Even bad guys that the audience might want to see get offed (like, say, Warren) can't be *slain* in a way that's as morally unproblematic as Buffy's routine dispatchment of vampires.  Spike is simply too much of a person to be staked.  And the scoobies don't stake him precisely because they do know him.    They use the rule about not staking unthreatening demons to skate around the hard question of what it would mean to stake a person they knew should he become threatening.

And that, of course, comes up explicitly in OOMM.  By their stated rules, Spike should be stakable the minute he shows that he's actually trying to get around the chip and that he fully intends to do harm the minute he does.  Yet the scoobies still don't stake him.  Nor do they even seriously engage the question.   I'm sure some wank is possible on why this doesn't even come up as a question -- but I think it's a pity, because it's at this point that there's a tension between the rule about non-threatening demons and the ookiness of having to stake someone that they know personally (however dangerous he is).  That does come back up, most notably in Selfless.  But the Scoobies  presumably sidestep it here because the show is more concerned with other themes at that point.

2.   The second that comes up a lot is that the real Spike should have called Buffy at some point in season 5 of AtS, and it's just OOC that he didn't.  I find that all straight-forward to explain.  Spike took some time before calling Buffy.  First he's a ghost and then he's just trying to avoid running straight back to her for a variety of reasons I find compelling.  But he tells Andrew in Damage that he intends to contact Buffy, and then in TGIQ he makes a clear move to contact Buffy.    Moreover, he's told (or at least it's broadly implied) that Buffy knows he's back and has made no move herself to contact him, and has further moved on with someone else with the thought that maybe she'd catch up with Spike at some point down the road.    Andrew doesn't give Spike any reason to think that Buffy feels miffed that Spike didn't manage to call her before Andrew himself spilled the beans.

Now none of these are obvious choices for Spike.  One might expect him to have tried to call sooner.  One might even think he'd be a bit less quick to take Andrew's word for Buffy's non-interest in his resurrection and her unconcern that he hadn't called her yet.   I'm fully persuaded that Spike 100% believes that Buffy doesn't love him.  But they were close enough at the end that he should have at least found it odd that she was 100% blase about his return... not interested enough to contact him or express anger at his failure to contact her.  Still, in the main, it makes enough sense for me to be puzzled when many people think it's really OOC for Spike to not have called, and to be especially puzzled by the fact that it's rarely acknowledged that Spike *did* try to contact her.

I wonder if my relative difficulty with the first plot contrivance and my relative lack of difficulty with the latter isn't pretty tied up with the themes I engage with.  I'm very interested in the line between demons and persons and the distinction between a slayer and a killer.  I find it one of the most fascinating aspects of the verse.  Spike's non-stakage sits on that issue, and it bothers me that the story bends around it most especially at OOMM.  By contrast, I'm a post-Spuffy fan who is post-Spuffy precisely because I don't think Buffy loved Spike, or at least was never going to love him in a way that was reciprocal.   I loved Spuffy in season 7, but precisely because Spike had stopped chasing after Buffy.  And so while I think the details are a bit goofy, I'm perfectly content with a season 5 AtS story line wherein Spike has stopped chasing after Buffy.

It's interesting to ponder what we make of the places where the story bends.  And especially what to do with it when the story bends in a way that does violence to the show.  My meta will always feel like there's a hole around OOMM.  Presumably for some there's a hole in season 5 of AtS.  There are other bends -- Angel's complete lack of assistance in season 5 despite his stated reason for giving up his humanity in IWRY comes to mind.  I like to treat the show as a well-written organic whole.  But there are a lot of places where it just isn't.  It's a TV show subject to lots of different demands and it just doesn't always add up.  Let's just say it makes the whole meta-game challenging!

Comments

[2maggie2.livejournal.com]

I read and enjoyed your meta a good while back. (I've read all your meta!!!) The piece by The Royal Anna is great.

I've been all over the map emotionally on this stuff. But I think I've come down very firmly on the point that Spike really doesn't think Buffy loves him. He thinks that any chance he might have had for that ended in Seeing Red. He only came back to help. He doesn't want anything from her. They both know that she doesn't love him. Early late and middle, through season 7 there's just a drum beat on the subject: Spike thinks she doesn't love him.

He gets his hopes up twice. When Buffy's not ready for him to not be there, he asks about the principal. And he wants to know if that night meant anything. Both times, Buffy takes back whatever crumbs prompted the hope. She answers Spike's question about the principal with silence rather than any assurance that there's no romance there. Feeling close doesn't have to mean anything. To cap off the last, Spike next sees her basking in Angel's glow with the sort of smile she has never ever bestowed on Spike.

I can see Spike going back to hopeful with the "I love you" and that informing the moves he makes towards going to find Buffy. But I think a lot of his comments about Buffy being there for him is bluster for Angel's benefit... don't forget, Spike SAW the basking. That's why Angel's assertion in Destiny hit home. Angel has no basis for saying what he says, but Spike has plenty of basis for believing him.

I think the hope is what motors him to the ticketing agent. But I think his actions tell us exactly how deep that hope goes. He postpones the brush off until he's got a start on his new life. That's why he waits until TGIQ. He's very quick to accept the news of the brush off. Too quick for someone who really expected something else.

I'm glad for people who can believe that Spike believed. I do think that Spike's delay is ALSO due to the decision to establish his own mission as a hero apart from Buffy. It's just for me it's a combo deal.

[angearia.livejournal.com]

I agree with a lot of what you're saying. I think it's more that those moments of belief come and go. And that his sojourn with Angel kept chipping away at his confidence without any correlating interaction with Buffy. While he may have believed in Chosen, I think that belief fades away every moment he's away from her and with Angel telling him he doesn't matter.

[elisi]

(I've read all your meta!!!)
Goodness. *is very flattered*

The piece by The Royal Anna is great.
Isn't it just? It manages to have its cake and eat it! :)

Aaaanyway - to me it's *obvious* that she loves him, which means that it should be obvious to him too, since he's been able to read Buffy's true feelings since day 1, pretty much. OTOH he has massive, massive issues re. Buffy, and so was probably hugely insecure.

Also, I think he believes Buffy deserves better.

So... dunno. It's impossible to come to a single 'truth' since the character is incredibly complex, and everyone sees him differently. :)