maggie2: (Default)
[personal profile] maggie2

[livejournal.com profile] sueworld2003  pointed to this one page preview for #36

http://forum.slayalive.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=buffyseason8&thread=10896&page=10#228614

A few reactions below the cut:

 1.  OMG, it's so good to see Spike again after all these years.  And that's *so* very, very Spike.

2.  Angel is obviously insane.  OK.  Not *obviously* insane.  But insane is a pretty good explanation for those three panels.  He's already at the tailor having the costume made when he 'hears' the tailor telling him to have the costume made.  Also?  Talking bird?  Usually evidence of being batshit insane.  To me it matches his expression in the reveal panel in #33 -- which always struck me as batshit insane.  We still don't really know, though.  But you know where my money is.

3.  Sooooooo good to see Spike again.  I guess I already said that.  Look! He's drinking!  IDW forgot that Spike drinks.  a lot.  Look!  He's not hitting on the girl who is definitely making herself available.  IDW forgot that Spike can sometimes talk to a woman without wanting to hump her.  Look!  He's in a ship's cabin alone!  IDW forgot that Spike spends a hell of a lot of time alone.  And white socks.  So cute.  I just want to nuzzle him.

4. Love, love, love the way the last two panels play.  And that line is just exactly Spike.  I love that he IDs Angel right off.  I love the implied contrast with Buffy who so didn't ID Angel even after a whole battle/conversation with him.  Spangels 1, Bangels 0. 

5.  Timing.  The Angel panels are well in advance of the Spike panels.  The Spike panels are all post Harmonic Divergence.  I'm pretty sure that's Harmony's magazine on the bed next to Spike.  The protest follows the Harmonic Divergence stuff -- and the girl has incorporated Twangels propoganda -- the men in the castle are now the 'slayer's victims'. 

Joss has a big mountain to climb in this arc, but boy this one page is great.  Did I mention that it's Soooooo good to see Spike again?


(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-24 04:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] local-max.livejournal.com
Oh I had a slightly different interpretation of the costume-making scene than you do (though not that dissimilar, I think). My first thought was not that he has no a priori reasons for getting a costume made, and then talking tailors supply the explanation when he gets there. It was more that Angel not only is being told and encouraged to do crazy things, but this is happening repeatedly--without end. The tailor is telling Angel what Angel already thinks (re: costume) again and again and again, so that the supposed reasons for Angel's behaviour get hammered into him. I'm not sure which interpretation is better.

(no subject)

Date: 2010-06-24 04:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 2maggie2.livejournal.com
I'm indifferent. Another possibility is that the voices directed him to the tailor, who then tells him he needs the costume that he's making. I think the effect is pretty much the same -- Angel's off his nut.

Love your other comment, but have nothing more to add. I'm not really seeing Cordelia-esqueness in the woman, but that's a small thing.

Profile

maggie2: (Default)
maggie2

September 2010

S M T W T F S
    1 234
5 678 91011
12 131415 161718
19 2021 22 232425
26 272829 30  

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags